Gu Lang economists struggle to break the monopoly of public policy - Lang, Gu Chujun - HC Network Appliance Industry
Dispute Gu Lang Lang proved a professor of analysis is correct, and domestic mainstream economists to refute statements are questionable.
With Gu Chujun legal judgments, continuing a year-long struggle between Lang and Gu finally come to an end. Facts have fully proved that Professor Lang's analysis is correct, but the mainstream economists argue remarks today seemed to be a questionable starting point is the passive defense. Recent media, attended the CEO Forum in Shenzhen last year, the domestic mainstream economists speaking fees as high as 80,000 yuan, there are a lot of money in royalties. Through these additional information, we have reason to suspect that these experts proposed by the state-owned enterprise reform policy objective and fair. Thus, it led us to reflect further on: how to break the existing policy of public policy monopoly?
Contemporary policy science research has shown that: the principal policy-making there are three: the elite of the main, the community and the public of the main subject. Developed countries, policy-making mode, going through to the public by the Community of the main subject of profound transformation, and our level of cultural development in technology is relatively backward, and the special form of policy arrangements, public policy model is slowly going through the main by the elite the main changes to the community. As we all know, the elite and community development to develop the main subject is the most prone to the phenomenon of the policy monopoly. The policy of monopoly situations in the policies that are mostly inefficient and even failure of policy, and a fair lack of serious phenomenon, because the policy-making monopoly rent-seeking has left a large space. Any policy at the macro level are reflected the country's strategic objectives and will, at the micro level, also embodies the norms, guide and resource allocation task. Therefore, the policy-making monopoly, will inevitably lead to rent-seeking interest groups and speculation.
In our current public policy formulation, the elite on their own reputation, prestige and influence, direct influence policy choice, they prefer, and by influencing public attention, to realize the policy choices. The development of the main community, face the same dilemma, and frankly, our ongoing transformation of policy-making model is a variant of gradualism model, which the original elite into a community, leading to influence policy-making factors on the basis of the original number added: If the visibility of the host institution, place of the geographic area. Although the Community to develop the main Elite main progress than many, but this development model, or not completely break the cycle of the policy monopoly. Simply look at a variety of research funds in China in recent years, the distribution of judges and, finally, the distribution of various funds, it is not difficult to find these problems.
National experience has fully shown that the market economy environment, the policy climate of policies introduced by the monopoly operating efficiency is not high. Gu Lang mentioned above dispute, and will lead to great debate, is a typical policy of monopoly and antitrust dispute. Because any policy of the state-owned enterprises are state-owned assets related to the configuration of the trillions of efficiency and equity issues, the mainstream economists, policy model (the elite and community mixed-mode), obviously based on efficiency as an excuse stifle fair, for the disposal of interest groups to defend the legitimacy of the state-owned assets. How long plagued our policy to break the monopoly? This is China's current policy-making level and to improve operating efficiency, and ensure fairness and reduce the cost and risk urgent need of reform issues.
Study on the author's view, the way to solve this problem there are two: First, from the inside to break the monopoly policy; Secondly, the policy from the outside to break the monopoly. The present situation, is a breakthrough from within the key to solve this problem, but the real difficulty of the operation is relatively large. This is because our current system of scientific research institutions and the transformation of relatively large resistance, for example, different voices is difficult to be treated fairly, in all disciplines such as internal voice largely elite institution of community control with the advantages of this formulation subject of monopoly, has seriously hindered the policy of open and competitive. For instance, in our policy-making institutions are institutions within the system can not produce like the U.S. Rand Corporation as a neutral policy advisory body. Gu Lang vigorous struggle, was able to achieve striking results is due to external factors that break the monopoly of the balance of the policy, resulting in a monopoly of the surface collapse. However, there is a great chance of this path, if not the Hong Kong Lang launched an attack, we can let all the people concerned about the MBO phenomenon? Even attention to those voices outside the mainstream can be taken seriously it? All this is unknown. Therefore, the attempt to break through the help of external factors, long-standing policy of a monopoly, only temporary solution, it can not control the sudden and accidental, and its results can not be predicted. Furthermore, it can not completely reverse the problem of deep structure, therefore, a key way to solve this problem have to start from the inside.
To break long-standing public policy making in China's monopoly, not only to enhance operating efficiency policy to accelerate the transformation of public policy model, is more concerned with all the people on the just and fair demand.
I am a professional writer from China Quality Dress, which contains a great deal of information about 8x21 binoculars , reflector telescope, welcome to visit!
